Advanced directives: open issues

Submitted: 2 May 2013
Accepted: 2 May 2013
Published: 3 May 2013
Abstract Views: 1365
PDF: 847
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

BACKGROUND In Italy Advanced directives have not been regulated by law yet. Moreover, there is a confusion of concepts: advanced directives, refusal of treatment, medical futility and euthanasia are not synonymous.
DISCUSSION The following aspects are then discussed: object of directives; elapse of time between their expression and their application; knowledge of the directives and their obligatory nature. The refusal of a treatment that can save a person's life is a critical subject. There are different ethical points of view: according to lay ethics, the patient's self-determination prevails; the religious viewpoint, instead, says that life is a gift which we cannot dispose of. In any case, the patient will be confronted with the professional autonomy of the doctor. Should the doctor save a patient's life in any case or should he achieve best clinical practice, in respect of his will? The doctor should interpret the patient's will but with caution and judgment. An exemption from responsibility should be provided by law for doctors who respect patient's living will.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Negrini, G. (2013). Advanced directives: open issues. Italian Journal of Medicine, 2(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2008.2.58