https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2018.980

Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine?

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018)
Submitted: 7 January 2018
Accepted: 27 March 2018
Published: 20 June 2018
Multiple-choice questions, clinical competence, pass mark criteria.
Abstract Views: 2667
PDF: 1174
HTML: 1889
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Flavio Tangianu
Internal Medicine, S. Martino Hospital, Oristano, Italy.
Antonino Mazzone
Medical Department, Internal Medicine, ASST Ovest-Milanese, Legnano (MI), Italy.
Franco Berti
Internal Medicine, S. Camillo Forlanini, Roma, Italy.
Giuliano Pinna
Internal Medicine, Asti, Italy.
Irene Bortolotti
Managing Director-Planning Congressi, Bologna, Italy.
Fabrizio Colombo
Internal Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Carlo Nozzoli
Internal Medicine and Emergency, Careggi Hospital, Firenze, Italy.
Micaela La Regina
Internal Medicine, S.S. Risk Management, Presidio Ospedaliero Unico del Levante Ligure, La Spezia, Italy.
Antonio Greco
Geriatric Department, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy.
Cristina Filannino
Department of Government, Health and not for profit, Luigi Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
Mauro Silingardi
Internal Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto Nardi
nardidoc48@gmail.com
Internal Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
There are many feasible tools for the assessment of clinical practice, but there is a wide consensus on the fact that the simultaneous use of several different methods could be strategic for a comprehensive overall judgment of clinical competence. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a well-established reliable method of assessing knowledge. Constructing effective MCQ tests and items requires scrupulous care in the design, review and validation stages. Creating high-quality multiple-choice questions requires a very deep experience, knowledge and large amount of time. Hereby, after reviewing their construction, strengths and limitations, we debate their completeness for the assessment of professional competence.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Tangianu, F., Mazzone, A., Berti, F., Pinna, G., Bortolotti, I., Colombo, F., Nozzoli, C., La Regina, M., Greco, A., Filannino, C., Silingardi, M., & Nardi, R. (2018). Are multiple-choice questions a good tool for the assessment of clinical competence in Internal Medicine?. Italian Journal of Medicine, 12(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2018.980

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.