Predictive value of Frank’s sign for obstructive coronary artery disease confirmed by coronary computed tomography angiography

Published: 7 February 2025
Abstract Views: 913
PDF: 76
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 19
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Numerous studies have suggested a link between Frank’s sign and coronary artery disease (CAD); however, there is limited data available from Southeast Asia, and no previous studies have been conducted in Vietnam to evaluate this association. This cross-sectional study examined 124 consecutive Vietnamese individuals who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography at our center. Differences in patient characteristics and the association between Frank’s sign and CAD were analyzed using Chi-square and t-tests. Multivariate regression was performed to adjust for confounding variables, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was utilized to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Frank’s sign for CAD. In this study, 124 patients with a mean age of 58.5±12.4 years, predominantly male, were included. Frank’s sign was present in 84% of the participants. Among these, males and older individuals had significantly higher rates compared to those without the sign. Obstructive CAD was observed in 48 patients (38.7%). The prevalence of obstructive CAD was significantly higher in those with Frank’s sign (52.5%) compared to those without it (13.6%), with p<0.001. Multivariate analysis identified Frank’s sign [odds ratio (OR) 3.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-10.82] and age (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.10) as independent risk factors for CAD. Frank’s sign demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.69, with 88% sensitivity and 50% specificity in predicting CAD. This study highlights a significant association between Frank’s sign and CAD, independent of established risk factors, in a Vietnamese population.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
Nawsherwan, Bin W, Le Z, et al. Prediction of cardiovascular diseases mortality- and disability-adjusted life-years attributed to modifiable dietary risk factors from 1990 to 2030 among East Asian countries and the world. Front Nutr 2022;9:898978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.898978
Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052
WHO. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in Viet Nam. Available from: https://www.who.int/vietnam/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases.
Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019;139:e56-e528.
Nguyen QN, Pham ST, Do LD, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factor patterns and their implications for intervention strategies in Vietnam. Int J Hypertens 2012;2012:560397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/560397
Nguyen RT, Meyer O, Chu J, et al. Social determinants of health, cardiovascular risk factors, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in individuals of Vietnamese origin. Am J Cardiol 2023;189:11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.028
Kazibwe J, Tran PB, Annerstedt KS. The household financial burden of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst 2021;19:96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-021-00732-y
Więckowski K, Gallina T, Surdacki A, Chyrchel B. Diagonal earlobe crease (Frank’s sign) for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Med 2021;10:2799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132799
Wu XL, Yang DY, Zhao YS, et al. Diagonal earlobe crease and coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2014;14:43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-43
Elliott WJ. Ear lobe crease and coronary artery disease. 1,000 patients and review of the literature. Am J Med 1983;75:1024-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)90883-5
Liu Z, Qiu C, Xu J, et al. Ear crease features are associated with complexity of coronary lesions. Med Sci Monit 2020;26:e923343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.923343
Aligisakis M, Marques-Vidal P, Guessous I, Vollenweider P. Did Dumbo suffer a heart attack? Independent association between earlobe crease and cardiovascular disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016;16:17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0193-7
Shrestha I, Ohtsuki T, Takahashi T, et al. Diagonal ear-lobe crease is correlated with atherosclerotic changes in carotid arteries. Circ J 2009;73:1945-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0141
Prangenberg J, Doberentz E, Johann L, Madea B. The prognostic value of the Frank sign. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2022;18:149-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00463-8
Elawad O, Albashir AAD. Frank ’s sign: dermatological marker for coronary artery disease. Oxf Med Case Reports 2021;2021:omab089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omab089
Molina-Gallardo R, Aurelien-Cabezas NS, Tiburcio-Jimenez D, et al. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors associated with diagonal earlobe crease (Frank sign) in Mexican adults: aging, obesity, arterial hypertension, and being male are the most important. Int J Hypertens 2024;2024:5598134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5598134
Wang Y, Mao LH, Jia EZ, et al. Relationship between diagonal earlobe creases and coronary artery disease as determined via angiography. BMJ Open 2016;6:e008558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008558
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2024;45:3415-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177
Kuri M, Hayashi Y, Kagawa K, et al. Evaluation of diagonal earlobe crease as a marker of coronary artery disease: the use of this sign in pre-operative assessment. Anaesthesia 2001;56:1160-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02317.x
Aksu F, Akkoc RF. Prevalence of Frank’s sign in healthy young individuals, morphological characteristics, and its association with family history of chronic disease. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00868-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00868-7
Kristensen BO. Ear-lobe crease and vascular complications in essential hypertension. Lancet 1980;1:265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(80)90761-8
Shoenfeld Y, Mor R, Weinberger A, et al. Diagonal ear lobe crease and coronary risk factors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1980;28:184-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1980.tb00514.x
Hou X, Jiang Y, Wang N, et al. The combined effect of ear lobe crease and conventional risk factor in the diagnosis of angiographically diagnosed coronary artery disease and the short-term prognosis in patients who underwent coronary stents. Medicine 2015;94:e815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000815
Toyosaki N, Tsuchiya M, Hashimoto T, et al. Earlobe crease and coronary heart disease in Japanese. Heart Vessels 1986;2:161-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02128142
Ramadhan M, Salsabila S, Laksono S. Earlobe crusade as useful screening for coronary artery disease in low- and middle-income countries of Asian; bring the ear–heart axis to the spotlight in cardiology: systematic review and implications for clinical practice. Apollo Med 2023;20:250-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_116_22

How to Cite

Phi Hung, T., Minh Kha, N., Tuong Vi, D., Trong Nhan, T., & Van Sy, H. (2025). Predictive value of Frank’s sign for obstructive coronary artery disease confirmed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Italian Journal of Medicine, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2025.1863