Obesity: a potential cause of varicocele leading to male infertility

Submitted: 10 October 2024
Accepted: 20 November 2024
Published: 20 December 2024
Abstract Views: 25
PDF: 15
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Male infertility is the root cause of social, psychological, economic, and medical problems. Obesity, culminating in varicocele, is one of the leading causes of male infertility. Veins of the lower abdomen are compressed by excessive subcutaneous fat, and the return of blood from the scrotum is compromised. This increases the intratesticular temperature, which decreases sperm quality. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of obesity on male infertility, particularly varicocele development. This cross-sectional study was conducted for 18 months with 172 men. The participants were categorized into obese and nonobese groups. Color Doppler ultrasound was performed to detect varicocele and related conditions. A chi-square test was applied to determine the associations between obesity and infertility with respect to varicocele. A significant association of varicocele with obesity was noted (p<0.05). The odds of the development of varicocele in obese individuals was 2.4 and the relative risk was 2.12 compared to nonobese individuals. In the nonobese group, 22 (25.5%) and 41 (47.67%) patients in the obese group were infertile. Compared with 25.5% of nonobese and infertile subjects, 47.6% of obese and infertile subjects concluded that a greater percentage of obese and infertile subjects were diagnosed with varicocele than nonobese and infertile subjects.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

Babakhanzadeh E, Nazari M, Ghasemifar S, Khodadadian A. Some of the factors involved in male infertility: a prospective review. Int J Gen Med 2020;13:29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S241099
Jawad Z, Mustafa R, Kanwal A, Khan S. Awareness regarding causes of infertility among outpatient at a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Health Sci 2022;16:227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221610227
Maheshwari A, Muneer A, Lucky M, et al. A review of varicocele treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Fertil 2020;1-8.
Garolla A, Grande G, Palego P, et al. Central role of ultrasound in the evaluation of testicular function and genital tract obstruction in infertile males. Andrology 2021;9:1490-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13060
Gurung P, Yetiskul E, Jialal I. Physiology, male reproductive system. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Wang S, Sun J, Wang J, et al. Does obesity based on body mass index affect semen quality?—a meta‐analysis and systematic review from the general population rather than the infertile population. Andrologia 2021;53:e14099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14099
Tanga BM, Qamar AY, Raza S, et al. Semen evaluation: methodological advancements in sperm quality-specific fertility assessment—a review. Anim Biosci 2021;34:1253-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0072
Billard R, Cosson M. The energetics of fish sperm motility. In: Gagnon C, ed. Controls of sperm motility. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1990. pp 153-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429281884-11
David MK, Leslie SW. Prostate specific antigen. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2020.
Moridi A, Roozbeh N, Yaghoobi H, et al. Etiology and risk factors associated with infertility. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci 2019;7:346-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2019.57
Delbaere I, Verbiest S, Tydén T. Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125:167-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2019.1707913
Hocaoglu C. The psychosocial aspect of infertility. In: Sheriff DS, ed. Infertility, assisted reproductive technologies and hormone assays. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80713
Lam IS, Trost LW, Casalino DD, Brannigan RE, 2019. Ultrasound in male infertility. In: Stadtmauer LA, Tur-Kaspa I, ed. Ultrasound imaging in reproductive medicine: advances in infertility work-up, treatment and ART. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2019. pp 213-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16699-1_13
Zubair A, Lotfollahzadeh S. Peripheral arterial duplex assessment, protocols, and interpretation. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Kang C, Punjani N, Lee RK, et al. Effect of varicoceles on spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2022;121:114-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.04.005
Spaggiari G, Granata AR, Santi D. Testicular ultrasound inhomogeneity is an informative parameter for fertility evaluation. Asian J Androl 2019;22:302-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_67_19
Lotti F, Bertolotto M, Maggi M, 2021. Historical trends for the standards in scrotal ultrasonography: What was, what is and what will be normal. Andrology 2021;9:1331-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13062
Tsili AC, Bougia CK, Pappa O, Argyropoulou MI. Ultrasonography of the scrotum: revisiting a classic technique. Eur J Radiol 2021;145:110000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110000
Chaudhuri GR, Das A, Kesh SB, et al. Obesity and male infertility: multifaceted reproductive disruption. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2022;27:8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-022-00099-2
Xiao-Bin G, Fang-Lei W, Hui X, et al. The association between body mass index and varicocele: A meta-analysis. Int Braz J Urol 2020;47:8-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0210
Hu X, Yang X, Zhao J, et al. Association between body mass index and varicocele among 211 989 Chinese reproductive‐age males. Int J Urol 2022;29:853-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14915
Guo D, Xu M, Zhou Q, et al. Is low body mass index a risk factor for semen quality? A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine 2019;98:e16677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016677
Palani A, Cannarella R, Saleh R, et al. Impact of varicocele repair on assisted reproductive technique outcomes in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Mens Health 2024. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.240132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.240132
Esteves SC. Pro: should varicocele be repaired in azoospermic infertile men?. In: Esteves SC, Cho CL, Majzoub A, Agarwal A, eds. Varicocele and male infertility: a complete guide. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2019. pp 485-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79102-9_44
Alkhayal A, Aljumaiah S, Alhagbani A, et al. Varicocelectomy for scrotal pain: is it effective? Urol Ann 2023;15:311-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_64_20

How to Cite

ul-Hasan, Z., Gilani, S. A., Hanif, A., Bacha, R., & Fatima, Z. (2024). Obesity: a potential cause of varicocele leading to male infertility. Italian Journal of Medicine, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2024.1827