https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2024.1783
Assessing the effect of implementing a central line care bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infections in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia
Published: 12 November 2024
Abstract Views: 824
PDF: 203
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 108
HTML: 20
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 108
HTML: 20
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are severe bloodstream infections caused by catheter use and are often associated with a longer hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and a higher mortality rate. However, catheter-related bloodstream infections can be successfully treated. It is essential that healthcare workers are aware of central line (CL) insertion and maintenance bundles to reduce and prevent the incidence of CLABSI. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of implementing CL care bundles on hospital-wide CLABSI incidence rates. This is a prospective study conducted at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Saudi Arabia from January 2017 to December 2021. The research period was divided into two phases: the pre-intervention phase (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018) and the post-intervention phase (January, 2019 to December 31, 2020). During both phases, outcome variables, including CLABSI rate, were assessed. In the present study, the total number of CLABSIs is 439, of which 266 were in the pre-intervention phase and 173 were in the post-intervention phase. The overall CLABSI rate significantly decreased from 1.6±0.05 in the pre-intervention phase to 0.9±0.05 in the post-intervention phase. This decline in CLABSI was significant (p<0.0001) across all hospital settings, including critical care and non-critical care units. The implementation of care bundles is essential and has been shown to significantly reduce CLABSI rates in nearly all participating units.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
PlumX Metrics
PlumX Metrics provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.
Citations
Zingg W, Cartier V, Inan C, et al. Hospital-wide multidisciplinary, multimodal intervention programme to reduce central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection. PLoS One 2014;9:e93898.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093898
Dudeck MA, Horan TC, Peterson KD, et al. National healthcare safety network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2010, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2011;39:798-816.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.001
Yaseen M, Al-Hameed F, Osman K, et al. A project to reduce the rate of central line associated bloodstream infection in ICU patients to a target of zero. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2016;5:u212545.w214986.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u212545.w4986
Khan RM, Subhani J, Arabi YMJSCCJ. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Critical Cate J 2019;3:43-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2543-1854.259482
Furuya EY, Dick AW, Herzig CT, et al. Central line–associated bloodstream infection reduction and bundle compliance in intensive care units: a national study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:805-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.67
Crnich CJ, Maki DGJCidr. The role of intravascular devices in sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2001;3:496-506.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-001-0086-4
Reynolds SS, Woltz P, Keating E, et al. Results of the chlorhexidine gluconate bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci 2021;16:45.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01112-4
Paul AA, Gentzler E, Solowey K, et al. Epidemiology, risk factors, and applicability of CDC definitions for healthcare-associated bloodstream infections at a level IV neonatal ICU. J Perinatol 2023;43:1152-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01728-y
Haddadin Y, Annamaraju P, Regunath H. Central line–associated blood stream infections. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatsPearls; 2017.
Toor H, Farr S, Savla P, et al. Prevalence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in intensive care and medical-surgical units. Cureus 2022;14:e22809.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22809
Ista E, van der Hoven B, Kornelisse RF, et al. Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:724-34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00409-0
Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061115
Coopersmith CM, Rebmann TL, Zack JE, et al. Effect of an education program on decreasing catheter-related bloodstream infections in the surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2002;30:59-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200201000-00009
Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286:700-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.6.700
Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:231-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/646902
Goldman J, Rotteau L, Shojania KG, et al. Implementation of a central-line bundle: a qualitative study of three clinical units. Implement Sci Commun 2021;2:105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00204-y
Marang-Van De Mheen PJ, van Bodegom-Vos LJBQ, Safety. Meta-analysis of the central line bundle for preventing catheter-related infections: a case study in appraising the evidence in quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:118-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003787
Resar R, Griffin F, Haraden C, et al. Using care bundles to improve health care quality. HI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012.
Perumal V, Alheraish YA, Shahzad M, et al. Knowledge, skills, and compliance of nurses related to central line-associated bloodstream infection in the Cardiovascular Department at King Faisal Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh. Cureus 2022;14:e30597.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30597
Esposito MR, Guillari A, Angelillo IF. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice on the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections among nurses in oncological care: a cross-sectional study in an area of southern Italy. PLoS One 2017;12:e0180473.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180473
Moureau NL, Flynn JJNr, practice. Disinfection of needleless connector hubs: clinical evidence systematic review. Nurs Res Pract 2015;2015:796762.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/796762
Gaid E, Assiri A, McNabb S, et al. Device-associated nosocomial infection in general hospitals, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013-2016. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2017;7:S35-40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.10.008
Blot K, Bergs J, Vogelaers D, et al. Prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infections through quality improvement interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:96-105.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu239
Al-Tawfiq JA, Amalraj A, Memish ZAJIJoID. Reduction and surveillance of device-associated infections in adult intensive care units at a Saudi Arabian hospital, 2004-2011. Int J Infect Dis 2013;17:e1207-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2013.06.015
Shehab N, Alschuler L, McILvenna S, et al. The national healthcare safety network’s digital quality measures: CDC’s automated measures for surveillance of patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024;31:1199-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae064
Song JE, Kwak YG, Oh G-B, et al. External and internal validation of healthcare-associated infection data collected by the Korean national healthcare-associated infections surveillance system (KONIS). Am J Infect Control 2024;52:214-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2023.06.020
Gray J, Proudfoot S, Power M, et al. Target CLAB Zero: a national improvement collaborative to reduce central line-associated bacteraemia in New Zealand intensive care units. N Z Med J 2015;128:13-21.
Tang H-J, Lin H-L, Lin Y-H, et al. The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:356.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-356
Leung PO, Lin HL, Lin YH, et al. Different compliance with central line insertion bundle between intensivist and nonintensivist staff in intensive care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:601-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/675844
Rosenthal VD. International nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) resources: INICC multidimensional approach and INICC surveillance online system. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:e81-90.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.005
O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e162-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257
Pinon M, Bezzio S, Tovo PA, et al. A prospective 7-year survey on central venous catheter-related complications at a single pediatric hospital. Eur J Pediatr 2009;168:1505-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-009-0968-2
Allen RC, Holdsworth MT, Johnson CA, et al. Risk determinants for catheter‐associated blood stream infections in children and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:53-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21497
Ogston-Tuck S. Intravenous therapy: guidance on devices, management and care. Br J Community Nurs 2012;17:474-84.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2012.17.10.474
Meek Schuldt L. Preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections: useful tools, an international perspective-tools directory. Available from: https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/m3rdsq.
Abbas AA, Fryer CJ, Paltiel C, et al. Factors influencing central line infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of a single institutional study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004;42:325-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.10450
Cecinati V, Brescia L, Tagliaferri L, et al. Catheter-related infections in pediatric patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;31:2869-77.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1652-4
Hung MC, Chen CJ, Wu KG, et al. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access device infection in pediatric patients with cancer. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2009;42:166-71.
Touré A, Vanhems P, Lombard-Bohas C, et al. Totally implantable central venous access port infections in patients with digestive cancer: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 2012;40:935-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.024
Pitiriga V, Bakalis J, Theodoridou K, et al. Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022;11:137.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1
Chopra V, Ratz D, Kuhn L, et al. PICC-associated bloodstream infections: prevalence, patterns, and predictors. Am J Med 2014;127:319-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.001
Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clinic Proc 2006;81:1159-71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4065/81.9.1159
Ratna AS, El-Saed A, Alsaif S, et al. Effect of central line bundle implementation on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in NICU in KSA. Int J Infect Control 2016;12(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3396/IJIC.v12i2.010.16
Al-Abdely HM, Alshehri AD, Rosenthal VD, et al. Prospective multicentre study in intensive care units in five cities from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: impact of the international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) multidimensional approach on rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection. J Infect Prev 2017;18:25-34.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177416669424
Lai CC, Cia CT, Chiang HT, et al. Implementation of a national bundle care program to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2018;51:666-71.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.10.001
Salama MF, Jamal W, Al Mousa H, et al. Implementation of central venous catheter bundle in an intensive care unit in Kuwait: effect on central line-associated bloodstream infections. J Infect Public Health 2016;9:34-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2015.05.001
Jaggi N, Rodrigues C, Rosenthal VD, et al. Impact of an international nosocomial infection control consortium multidimensional approach on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in adult intensive care units in eight cities in India. Int J Infect Dis 2013;17:e1218-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2013.07.007
Kallen AJ, Patel PR, O’Grady NPJCID. Preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections outside the intensive care unit: expanding prevention to new settings. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:335-41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/653942
Han J, Wan J, Cheng Y, et al. A hospital-wide reduction in central line–associated bloodstream infections through systematic quality improvement initiative and multidisciplinary teamwork. Am J Infect Control 2019;47:1358-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.05.008
Marschall J, Leone C, Jones M, et al. Catheter-associated bloodstream infections in general medical patients outside the intensive care unit: a surveillance study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:905-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/519206
How to Cite
Alhumaidan, O., Alkudmani, Z., Alnafee, K., Alshuhri, S., Alrashid, B., Alkahtany, J., Almazrua, A., & Alghamdi, S. (2024). Assessing the effect of implementing a central line care bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infections in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Italian Journal of Medicine, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2024.1783
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.