Complexity in hospital internal medicine departments: what are we talking about?

Submitted: 26 July 2013
Accepted: 26 July 2013
Published: 19 September 2013
Abstract Views: 2398
PDF: 1043
HTML: 1028
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Internal medicine (IM) patients are mostly elderly, with multiple complex co-morbidities, usually chronic. The complexity of these patients involves the intricate entanglement of two or more systems (e.g. body and disease, family-socio-economic and environmental status, coordination of care and therapies) and this requires comprehensive, multi-dimensional assessment (MDA). Despite attempts to improve management of chronic conditions, and the availability of several MDA tools, defining the complex patient is still problematic. The complex profile of our patients can only be described through the best assessment tools designed to identify their characteristics. In order to do this, the Federation of Associations of Hospital Doctors on Internal Medicine FADOI has created its own vision of IM. This involves understanding the different needs of the patient, and analyzing diseases clusters and the possible relationships between them. By exploring the real complexity of our patients and selecting their real needs, we can exercise holistic, anthropological and appropriate choices for their treatment and care. A simpler assessment approach must be adopted for our complex patients, and alternative tools should be used to improve clinical evaluation and prognostic stratification in a hierarchical selection of priorities. Further investigation of complex patients admitted to IM wards is needed.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

How to Cite

Nardi, R., Berti, F., Greco, A., Scanelli, G., Leandri, P., Reta, M., Mazzetti, M., Pasquale, A., Belmonte, G., Magnani, M., Frasson, S., Baldo, C., Gussoni, G., Vescovo, G., La Regina, M., Campanini, M., Iori, I., Mathieu, G., Mazzone, A., & Nozzoli, C. (2013). Complexity in hospital internal medicine departments: what are we talking about?. Italian Journal of Medicine, 7(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2013.142

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.