Generic - equivalent drugs use in internal and general medicine patients: distrust, confusion, lack of certainties or of knowledge? Part 2. Misconceptions, doubts and critical aspects when using generic drugs in the real world

Submitted: 11 June 2013
Accepted: 23 August 2013
Published: 8 May 2014
Abstract Views: 1887
PDF: 1973
HTML: 1868
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

A lot of issues have been raised to argue that equivalent drugs may not work as well or at least the same as what the drug industry likes to call innovator products. Many doubts and biases are also reported in connection with the use of generic drugs. Doctors are mostly concerned about their efficacy, their tolerability, the quality and amount of active ingredients, their formulation or excipients, their packaging, their pharmaceutical form and their palatability. We describe the differences between prescribability (equivalence when prescribing a drug to a patient for the first time) and switchability (interchangeability of drugs for a patient already in treatment) considering the notions of average bioequivalence, population bioequivalence and individual bioequivalence as well as the usefulness of the U.S. Orange Book in the assessment of bioequivalence. Other key issues deserve attention, such as: duplicate applications for medicinal products, different salt forms, formulations used in the development of each medicinal product and excipients, product quality. Clinicians in collaboration with pharmacists and research pharmacologists have to find solutions for unanswered questions and unsolved doubts, by developing targeted studies, communication tools and shared guidelines.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

How to Cite

Nardi, R., Masina, M., Cioni, G., Leandri, P., & Zuccheri, P. (2014). Generic - equivalent drugs use in internal and general medicine patients: distrust, confusion, lack of certainties or of knowledge? Part 2. Misconceptions, doubts and critical aspects when using generic drugs in the real world. Italian Journal of Medicine, 8(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2014.399