The justice, the glycosylated haemoglobin and the government of appropriateness

Submitted: 30 April 2013
Accepted: 30 April 2013
Published: 3 May 2013
Abstract Views: 643
PDF: 857
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

BACKGROUND The misappropriateness is one of the principal critical situations in the Laboratory Medicine by an estimation of about 30-40% of all demands. It results in a very high number of requested tests with possible relapses on the patient health. Obviously, the problem is also economic, therefore, undoubtedly, in the view of a principle of justice, the limited SSN economic resources must be diverted only to prescriptions useful for public welfare.
AIM OF STUDY In this work, the prescription of the glycosylated haemoglobin test is evaluated in the prospective of the justice. This test is considered as an example of all prescriptions whose rational modalities of use have not yet been overall accepted by the scientific community. The critical situation obviously reflects on the functional use of resources, which are becoming more and more limited and therefore have to be directed only to the procedures really useful to the patient. We remark how the three principal government systems of offered laboratory services (political/administrative measures such as sanitary ticket, active rules related to scientific/health care criteria and guide lines) have demonstrated evident drawbacks whose basic indicator is represented by high rates of misappropriateness. Therefore, more diligence and involvement of physicians are required in order to propose real solutions coming from scientific premises for better diagnostic test prescriptions. It is underlined that without a direct, effective control of appropriateness, and consequently of the costs, by the clinical staff, it is inevitable that there will be somebody else who will decide and govern the demand of prescriptions in the absence of any scientific rules.
CONCLUSIONS At last, solutions are proposed for reducing the number of misappropriated requests. The opportunities coming from the information technology could permit a structural solution to the problem using a software that can automatically drive prescriptions. The aim is to give the physicians a series of measures of prescription, produced by experts, that are then progressively spread to the majority of laboratory services. The instructions can be real timeupdated and allow a widespread and well-blended knowledge all over the national territory. Prescriptions in agreement with the instructions would be carried out also in the hospital place.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

How to Cite

Camerotto, A., Formenton, F., Natali, G., di Liddo, R., Pozzato, A., & Furin, M. (2013). The justice, the glycosylated haemoglobin and the government of appropriateness. Italian Journal of Medicine, 2(4), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2008.4.52