Egophony: is this classic semeiological sign still helpful?

Submitted: 29 April 2013
Accepted: 29 April 2013
Published: 30 April 2013
Abstract Views: 1524
PDF: 1851
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

BACKGROUND Egophony, also known as E to A change, is a classical, clinical sign detected by chest auscultation, consisting into a change in timbre, but not pitch or volume, produced by solid interposed between the resonator and the stethoscope head. Egophony was first described in 1916 by R.T.H. La«nnec, but today it is almost unknown. Yet it is a powerful tool to detect pleural effusion as well as other pathological conditions associated with lung compression or consolidation, such as hemothorax or atelectasis of the lung.
AIM OF THE STUDY The aim of this paper is to remember the value of this frequently neglected clinical sign and to stress the importance of physical examination, that should always precede - and could often replace - instrumental tests, which are quite expensive and sometimes unnecessary.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics  provide insights into the ways people interact with individual pieces of research output (articles, conference proceedings, book chapters, and many more) in the online environment. Examples include, when research is mentioned in the news or is tweeted about. Collectively known as PlumX Metrics, these metrics are divided into five categories to help make sense of the huge amounts of data involved and to enable analysis by comparing like with like.

Citations

How to Cite

Viviani, D., & Gasbarrini, G. (2013). Egophony: is this classic semeiological sign still helpful?. Italian Journal of Medicine, 3(2), 80–81. https://doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2009.80